Featured news from NHIVNA
HIV-related news from NAM
Does low-level HIV viral load raise the risk of disease progression and co-morbidities?
Liz Highleyman, 2015-11-09 08:20:00
People living with HIV who have a detectable but low viral load – in the range of 50 to 500 or 1000 copies/ml – may continue to have a higher risk of AIDS-related events, but their likelihood of experiencing serious non-AIDS events including heart, liver and kidney disease did not appear to increase, according to a pair of Italian studies presented at the 15th European AIDS Conference last month in Barcelona, Spain.
It is well known that effective combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) that suppresses HIV replication dramatically reduces disease progression and improves survival. Recent findings from the large START trial showed that people who initiate treatment soon after diagnosis had a lower risk of both AIDS-related illnesses and non-AIDS events and death compared to those who waited until their CD4 cell count fell.
A small proportion of people with HIV have persistently detectable but low viral load despite treatment, and the effects of low-level viraemia are not fully understood. Even a low level of ongoing viral replication can lead to increased immune activation and inflammation, which may contribute to non-AIDS-related co-morbidities such as heart disease and cancer. However, some previous large observational studies have not seen an association between low-level virus and increased risk of AIDS, non-AIDS illness or death.
Andrea Antinori and fellow investigators with the ICONA Foundation Study Cohort estimated three-month incidence of AIDS-related events, severe non-AIDS events or death among people with current low-level viraemia compared to those with viral loads below 50 copies/ml.
The analysis included 7277 participants in the Italian ICONA cohort who had at least one person-year of follow-up spent with a viral load in the range of zero to 1000 copies/ml at least six months after starting first-line combination ART. Three-quarters were men, most were white, the median age was 37 years and 18% had hepatitis C co-infection. The median CD4 count at ART initiation was approximately 300 cells/mm3 and 13% had been diagnosed with AIDS. The most common ART regimen was efavirenz (Sustiva) plus tenofovir/emtricitabine (the drugs in Truvada), but a wide range of other drugs were also used.
The researchers classified participants into four groups according to viral load six months after starting ART:
- 0-50 copies/ml (n = 3919)
- 51-200 copies/ml (n = 1811)
- 201-500 copies/ml (n = 1117)
- 500-1000 copies/ml (n = 430)
They compared two composite endpoints across the viral load groups: AIDS or death due to any cause; and serious non-AIDS events according to the definition used in the SMART study (major cardiovascular, kidney or liver disease) and death due to any cause, over the course of three months.
A total of 204 AIDS-related events or deaths occurred during 28,429 person-years of follow-up. Incidence rates of AIDS-related events or death were 0.52, 1.25, 1.91 and 1.06 per 100 person-years for participants with viral loads of 0-50, 51-200, 201-500 and 500-1000 copies/ml, respectively.
The adjusted risks of AIDS-related events or death were 1.74 (a 74% increase), 2.30 (more than double the risk) and 1.30 (a 30% increase) for people with 51-200, 201-500 and 500-1000 copies/ml, respectively, compared to those with 0-50 copies/ml; these differences were statistically significant for the 51-200 and 201-500 groups, but not for the 500-1000 group.
A total of 438 serious non-AIDS events or deaths occurred during follow-up. Incidence rates of serious non-AIDS events or death were 1.46, 1.77, 1.69 and 2.56 for the respective viral load groups. The adjusted risks of serious non-AIDS events or death were 1.09 (little change), 1.00 (no difference) and 1.54 (a 54% increase) for people with 51-200, 201-500 and 500-1000 copies/ml, respectively, none of which were statistically significant.
"Low-level viremia, in the range of 51-500 copies/ml, was associated with an independent risk of developing a new AIDS diagnosis, which was up to 2.3-fold higher than that observed in the presence of suppressed viral load," the researchers concluded. "Conversely, low-level viremia did seem to predict a more elevated risk of serious non-AIDS events."
They noted, however, that the viral load categories in this study were based on current levels and could not account for sustained periods of low-level viral replication. Occasional viral 'blips' are not uncommon during treatment, but persistent viraemia is a greater concern. They also said the short follow-up period may have underestimated long-term effects on clinical endpoints.
These results, they added, "may be useful to plan analyses aimed at better defining threshold of virological failure valid for clinical purposes and to eventually optimise treatment strategies."
Source:1
