Featured news from NHIVNA
HIV-related news from NAM
Time spent by US HIV patients in care with a transmissible viral load has fallen by three-quarters since 2000
Gus Cairns, 2017-02-18 23:50:00
A study by the US Centers for the Disease Control (CDC) presented at the
recent Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Seattle found that the proportion of people who are in care
but not virally suppressed has fallen from 40% to 10% in the last 15 years.
It also found that young people, black people and people with public
rather than private health insurance were less likely to achieve suppressed
The biggest problem the United States faces in reaching the UNAIDS 90/90/90
target and having 72.9% of its entire HIV-positive population virally
suppressed is the high proportion in that country who are diagnosed but not in
care. It is estimated that 61% of HIV transmissions in the US come from people in
Some transmissions, however, still come from people who are in care but
are not virally suppressed (the ‘third 90’).
The CDC’s Kate Buchacz analysed figures from the HOPS cohort, an open,
prospective cohort of 5000 HIV-positive people in care at a varied selection of
HIV clinics, mainly hospital-based, in nine US cities. HOPS has been
established since 1993 but this study looked at viral suppression in HOPS
patients from 2000 to 2014.
The definition of being ‘virally suppressed’ was the proportion of time
spent with a viral load below 1500 copies/ml, which is not the usual definition
of ‘undetectable' (usually below 50 copies/ml), but is the one used by the World
Health Organization as the threshold for infectiousness, as very
few transmissions have ever been seen from someone with a viral load below this
There were 5873 patients in the study with an average follow-up of 5.4
years, amounting to 37,794 person-years of observation altogether. On average
15 viral load tests were taken per patient with a median time of 3.6 months
During that time people spent 86% of their time on ART and 14% off it. The
proportion of people who were on ART but not virally suppressed was 13% over
that whole time period. In addition there were 4% of people who were not on ART
but were virally suppressed.
The proportion who were not virally suppressed fell over time. In 2000
36% of patients were not suppressed and this reached a peak of 40% in 2003. It
then fell steadily to 10% in 2014. However not all of these patients were on
ART: while 90% were in 2000, this fell to 80% in 2003 to 2004, then rose
steadily to 93% in 2014. Not all the patients off ART were drug-naïve: in
2003-2004 more than half of those not on ART (11% of patients) were treatment-experienced
and taking breaks – only 3% of patients are on breaks now. This may have
coincided with the period of maximum concern about long-term toxicities: the SMART
study, the first one to show that it was generally better to be on ART than not,
its results in 2006.
The proportion who were not virally suppressed on ART and therefore representing true treatment failure was 31% in
2000, falling to 7% in 2014. This varied somewhat by drug class. In 2000, 22%
of people on NNRTI-based regimens were not virally suppressed versus 32% on protease
inhibitor (PI) regimens: this number had fallen to 4% and 11% respectively by 2014,
but does not take account of the fact that people on PI regimens are more likely
to be on second-line therapy and/or have drug resistance. In 2014 9% of people on integrase inhibitors, which were unavailable in 2000, were not virally
In multivariate analyses, certain groups of people were more or less
likely to be virally suppressed. Older people were more likely, with the likelihood
rising by 9% for every ten years older, and people aged below 35 were 50% more
likely to have viral loads over 1500 copies/ml on ART than people over 50.
People with public rather than private health insurance were 24% more likely to
have viral loads over 1500 copies/ml, and black people 19% more likely than
white people. Women were more likely than men to have viral loads over 1500
copies/ml – 31% versus 22%, or 26% in heterosexual men alone – but this association
lost significance after controlling for race and insurance status, i.e. women
were less likely to be virally suppressed because they were black or had public
insurance, not because they were women.
This study reinforces the findings from another
presented at the conference, which showed that disparities in age, race and insurance
status continue to affect the success of antiretroviral treatment. As this
study was of patients in care who were largely on treatment, it shows that
access to treatment may not be the sole determinant of viral load; adherence
and drop-outs from treatment caused by insurance problems may also have a role to
play, though HOPS did not directly measure adherence.