The researchers sum up their findings: “The rapid uptake of
PrEP by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney during its early
implementation has been accompanied by an equally rapid decrease in consistent
condom use.”
But HIV diagnoses did not increase as a result. The
researchers point out that the changes coincided with a historic decrease in
the number of new diagnoses in gay men in both Victoria (down 16% between 2016
and 2017) and New South Wales (down 11%). These trends are probably the result
of a gradual increase in the number of gay men who know their status through
HIV testing and who achieve undetectable viral load with HIV treatment – as well
as the rapid scale-up of PrEP.
“The rapid increase in PrEP use seems to have outweighed the
rapid decrease in condom use in this early phase of PrEP implementation,” comment
the authors.
Whereas other studies have tracked the sexual behaviour of
PrEP users, this study is notable for observing a decrease in condom use in the
wider community, in non-PrEP users. This could be described as ‘community-level
risk compensation’.
Why might men not taking PrEP use condoms less often? The
authors suggest that this could be because they perceive that condomless sex has
become less risky due to the widespread use of PrEP. An individual may feel
confident that a partner who is taking PrEP will not have HIV, or may feel that
because of PrEP, HIV infection has generally become less prevalent.
Only
one other study has previously observed this. In San Francisco between 2011
and 2014, PrEP use by HIV-negative men increased from 0% to 9·6% while
consistent condom use decreased from 30·5% to 17·5%.
This issue will need to be factored into mathematical
modelling of the impact of PrEP. “The beneficial effect of PrEP on HIV
epidemics might have been overestimated, particularly in settings in which it
was assumed that condom use would be sustained in MSM [men who have sex with men] not using PrEP.”
The researchers also argue that there should be investment
in community education campaigns while PrEP is scaled up. These should support
the use of condoms within the context of a diversity of HIV prevention
practices.
“Our findings suggest that the rapid uptake of PrEP
disrupted condom use at a community level,” commented Martin Holt. “However,
it’s too early to tell the long-term effects of increasing PrEP use and
declining condom use on HIV diagnoses in Victoria and New South Wales.”